Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '17 at 05:59
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 894
82% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,303
81% 1,303 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 121
Parallax 103
96% 114 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 105
Splatting 105
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 1,322
Mixed 1,229
348% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 40.4
180% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 99.8
108% 182 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 232%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
65GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 483
Write 234
Mixed 250
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 14.1
94% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 30.1
67% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
927GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 182
Mixed 168
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.38
145% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
881GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 169
Mixed 159
127% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.38
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.34
142% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
339GB free
Firmware: CC9C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 157
Write 154
Mixed 150
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.13
60% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
27GB free
Firmware: ES12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45% Average
Read 77.1
Write 79.8
Mixed 90.2
62% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.26
61% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 60%
WDC WD75 00BPVT-75HXZT3 750GB
242GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 69
Mixed 60.3
85% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.16
66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback