Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450M-A
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 13:42
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 917
82% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 75.4
Parallax 69.1
58% 71.7 fps
MRender 85.8
Gravity 72
Splatting 66.9
60% 74.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 462 461 455 407 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 460
Mixed 443
SusWrite 440
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 47.1
156% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 296
244% 349 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
221GB free
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 148 136 147 148 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 455
Write 383
Mixed 296
SusWrite 170
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 7.7
36% 9.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 56%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
220GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 357 357 360 361 360 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 492
Write 354
Mixed 234
SusWrite 358
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 15
95% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 84.2
113% 200 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 86%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
438GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 218 221 212 209 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 452
Write 393
Mixed 300
SusWrite 234
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 15.8
76% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 32.7
46% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 61%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
900GB free
Firmware: 1201
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 109
Mixed 82.2
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.8
266% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
8GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 102
Mixed 111
145% 118 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 4.1
293% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%
Spaceloop 8GB 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.5 5 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.3
9% 8.93 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 33.5
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 30.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback