Today's hottest deals

Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 12:13
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 137
59% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 212
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 33
Parallax 31.7
26% 32.1 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 22.4
24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 96 92 92 100 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 203
Write 118
Mixed 131
SusWrite 92.5
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 25
31% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45%
Great: 80%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
46GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 136 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 111
Write 34.2
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 135
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 309GB
8GB free
Firmware: V54OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 46 48 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 31.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 42.7
24% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback