MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 20:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 115
56% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 323
37% 290 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.3
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 79 86 96 97 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 223
Write 206
Mixed 198
SusWrite 89.6
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 28.7
98% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 35.5
31% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 81 92 100 102 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 93.2
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 83%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB
898GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 25.4
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 25.4
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-E51(MS-7596) Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback