Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 159 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 385 45% 347 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Lighting 9.1 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 11.9 7% 11 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 10.7 10% 12 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0200Sc10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 28 15 24 14 21 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.7% Very poor	Read 182 Write 136 Mixed 89 SusWrite 22.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 1 8% 4.63 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 55.5 DQ Mixed 19.7 20% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 100%
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$42 8,782 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 58GB free Firmware: 0006HPM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 19 26 16 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 72.5 Write 75 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 26.6 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 50GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 47% null MHz 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.3 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $221