Asus ET2011A

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus ET2011A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ET2011A
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110819
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '20 at 18:51
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 19.4 2-Core 37 25% 35 Pts	4-Core 39.5 8-Core 39.6 5% 39.5 Pts	64-Core 37.1 2% 37.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84AB) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Initio INIC-3639 96GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 12GB free Firmware: 0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 18 18 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 24.2 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 16.9 5% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.8 7% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 10%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 70 101 113 117 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 102 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 3GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 11 13 6 9.4 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.3% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 9.5 14% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 49% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET2011A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2011A

CPU
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	1x
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GBHynixBench 36%, 32 samples	1x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,522 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16