IBM System x3500 M4: -[7383E7G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3500 M4: -[7383E7G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00AL034
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131212
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 13:38
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 97
43% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 176
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M1115 2TB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 111 107 116 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
Read 87
Write 77.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 114
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
789GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 19 22 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 21
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 20.3
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270QB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 24 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback