HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 843B
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '20 at 12:28
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 273 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 846 84% 687 Pts	64-Core 1040 64% 1040 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.6% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 36 28% 36.6 fps	MRender 35.5 Gravity 37 Splatting 26.1 26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 582GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 76 77 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 462 Write 79.5 Mixed 116 SusWrite 75.6 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 21.4 91% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 104 84% 121 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 87GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 52.2 Write 50.6 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 56.7 34% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 59%
Asmt USB3.0 500GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 80GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 87 87 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 89.7 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 87.5 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 68%
Asmt USB3.0 1TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 930GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 90 91 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 209 Write 142 Mixed 91.4 SusWrite 90.9 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 95%
ST1000LM 025 HN-M101ABB 1TB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 505GB free, PID 0569 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 83 83 84 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 88.2 Write 63.7 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 82.6 94% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 45%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 267GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 34.6 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 36.9 44% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%
ST350083 0A 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 82GB free, PID 00d5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.1% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 20.2 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 20.9 35% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 14%
ST350031 2CS 500GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 466GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 37.5 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 21.7 40% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43TB1-CTD 1x8GB 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.3% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.8 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx Builds (Compare 1,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $127Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	755x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	479x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	188x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	435x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	379x
Radeon RX 580AMDBench 41%, 6,488 samples	251x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	160x
hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBSKBench 111%, 2,891 samples	112x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	90x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	161x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples	148x
M378A1G43TB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,717 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16