Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 38% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L755  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 04:59
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 78%
CPU Throttled 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 37.8
25% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 52.6
7% 52.3 Pts
64-Core 52.3
3% 52.3 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 1
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3
Splatting 2.2
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Sanal Diski 65GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 98 44 61 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.9% Below average
Read 382
Write 334
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 88.2
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 11
40% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 45.9
DQ Write 39.9
DQ Mixed 28.6
25% 38.1 MB/s
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
25GB free
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 99 44 61 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 430
Write 383
Mixed 364
SusWrite 88.6
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 6.4
49% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 29.3
49% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 92%
Lenovo USB Flash Drive 16GB
3GB free, PID 3870
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.6 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 7.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 7.4
11% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BKH400SO25608-1333 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback