Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 23:52
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$144
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 922
96% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 66.2
43% 58.6 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 52
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1963 920 752 779 739 765 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,588
Write 2,184
Mixed 1,806
SusWrite 986
423% 1,891 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 90.4
302% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1,196
896% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 311%
Great: 355%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
50GB free
Firmware: 520ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 202 161 154 153 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 365
Write 249
Mixed 298
SusWrite 167
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 39.1
152% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 228
178% 245 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 85%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
709GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 470 469 469 472 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 477
Mixed 411
SusWrite 465
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52.7
181% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 291
241% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
104GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 116 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 140
Write 87.5
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 114
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73%
Great: 112%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 34GB
31GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 33 6.8 33 8.1 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 19.7
17% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 32.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $683
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback