Asrock Z170 Pro4S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Pro4S  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 467
62% 466 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adat SU650 240GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 373
Write 101
Mixed 71.1
39% 182 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 24.4
104% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 181
118% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 89%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
2GB free
Firmware: SBFK
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 299
Write 102
Mixed 276
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 22.2
122% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 134
131% 202 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
1GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.7
Write 89.9
Mixed 69.9
62% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNT 500GB
9GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 73 76 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 77.2
Write 78.1
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 74.9
51% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 25.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Pro4S Builds (Compare 881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Pro4S - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback