HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805D
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 14:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 402
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 805D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7757
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.4
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 259 250 251 244 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 464
Write 425
Mixed 347
SusWrite 256
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 40.6
133% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 314
236% 317 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 122%
USB3.0 DISK 8GB
2GB free, PID b168, apacer
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 25 24 25 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.4% Poor
Read 85.1
Write 27
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 23.3
46% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
61% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 1,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback