Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 170
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 520
58% 459 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 63.8
34% 54.5 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 42.9
40% 50.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 72 46 39 46 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 242
Write 99.7
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 62.3
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 9.3
42% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 11.7
9% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
582GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 77 46 39 47 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 185
Write 107
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 63.4
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-050.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback