Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1000M 3,569 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 63 1-Core 49.2 2-Core 92.1 43% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 94 8-Core 94.8 13% 94.4 Pts	64-Core 91.8 6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 149 51 65 41 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 452 Write 337 Mixed 128 SusWrite 80 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 22.6 76% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 171 134% 183 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	14x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	1x

RAM
R538G1601S2SL 2x8GBUnknownBench 50%, 55 samples	3x
R538G1601S2SL 1x8GBUnknownBench 23%, 94 samples	2x
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	2x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100