Acer Aspire X1470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X1470  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1470
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 09:35
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 64.3
41% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 62.6
8-Core 65.1
8% 63.8 Pts
64-Core 66.5
4% 66.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6370D
Acer(1025 061D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 48 64 75 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 85.5
Write 85.9
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 60.8
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD63I1C1624EV 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1470 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback