Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 04:09
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 179
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 334
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 32.6
27% 33.4 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 23.2
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 131 132 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 130
Write 192
Mixed 167
SusWrite 129
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 36.2
137% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 151
118% 160 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 41.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 4.6
10% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback