HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 701
69% 563 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 214
Parallax 164
122% 176 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 129
Splatting 116
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
AMD FirePro W5100
HP(103C 230C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 24.7
14% 22.1 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 21.6
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 633 617 617 615 632 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 877
Mixed 732
SusWrite 624
202% 910 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 52.1
198% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 423
366% 558 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 183%
Great: 237%
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
195GB free
Firmware: 20WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 430 429 430 428 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 431
Mixed 249
SusWrite 424
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 26
130% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 214
173% 245 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 102%
MB4000GCWLV 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 170 171 172 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 164
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 171
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback