Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 154 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 506 54% 430 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.57 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 19.4 11% 17.1 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 366GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 93 102 102 100 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 92.3 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 2x8GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 20.3 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	240x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	220x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	53x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	168x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	146x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373