Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '17 at 22:01
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 73
2-Core 144
60% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 436
42% 347 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 22.2
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 18.7
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 379
Write 331
Mixed 355
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 19.8
98% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 62.5
DQ Mixed 19.7
23% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
190GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 493
Write 386
Mixed 404
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 35.7
126% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 64.1
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
233GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 89.9
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.66
123% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 74%
STM31000 528AS 1TB
242GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 30.8
Mixed 30.1
39% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.34
55% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback