Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 22:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 463
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 47
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 55.5
38% 51.2 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 43.8
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Generic 500GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 677 668 684 687 694 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 91%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
578GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 502 499 498 497 498 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 946
Write 493
Mixed 646
SusWrite 497
144% 645 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 8.1
43% 11 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334232202020 0x859B 0x4354344734534653383234412E43384648502020 0x802C 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334232202020 0x859B 0x4354344734534653383234412E43384648502020 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback