Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 18:20
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 235
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 450
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 148
Parallax 140
109% 140 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 135
Splatting 100
94% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 461
Mixed 312
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 56.6
192% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 220 224 227 224 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 200
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 223
129% 176 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.9
243% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 119%
Great: 131%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
209GB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 152 150 151 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 176
Mixed 94
SusWrite 150
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.7
243% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 131%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 24 32 23 33 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 47
Write 11
Mixed 7
SusWrite 25.5
25% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
86% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 27%
HGST HDN 726060ALE614 6TB
5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 215 216 211 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.6% Excellent
Read 207
Write 218
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 207
239% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.2
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback