Performance Results


Gaming 151% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 164% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A91
Motherboard	MSI X299 XPOWER GAMING AC (MS-7A91) (all builds)
Memory	44.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '20 at 12:03
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 79.5 1-Core 132 2-Core 266 86% 159 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 1,014 90% 761 Pts	64-Core 1,687 104% 1,687 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	177% Outstanding	Lighting 241 Reflection 302 Parallax 371 196% 305 fps	MRender 339 Gravity 259 Splatting 152 194% 250 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2383 803 806 801 806 805 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	309% Outstanding	Read 2,298 Write 2,308 Mixed 1,741 SusWrite 1,067 416% 1,854 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 238 4K Mixed 78.9 318% 126 MB/s	DQ Read 1,364 DQ Write 1,101 DQ Mixed 1,227 920% 1,231 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 309% Great: 355%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 9,880 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2123 2120 2125 2115 2134 2109 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	376% Outstanding	Read 2,548 Write 2203 Mixed 2,141 SusWrite 2121 507% 2,253 MB/s	4K Read 67 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 94.4 309% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,152 DQ Write 993 DQ Mixed 1,076 806% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 376% Great: 541%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 236GB free, PID 61f5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 453 452 453 453 452 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	378% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 448 Mixed 373 SusWrite 453 588% 433 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 31.4 3,456% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 61.4 DQ Mixed 33.5 3,325% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 378% Great: 383%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C16 3x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 3 of 8 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.9% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 17.7 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 10.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	12x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	7x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	6x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,028

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16