Besstar UM300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBesstar UM300  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM300
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 19:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 179
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 384
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.9
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 17.9
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 133 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 444
Write 255
Mixed 326
SusWrite 106
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 31.9
124% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 177
147% 209 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 85%
Verbatim SECURE PRO 8GB
3GB free, PID 024c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 154
Write 25.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 25.6
62% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 5.6
405% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM300 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback