bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory45.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200102
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 18:41
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 161
53% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 608
55% 463 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro R5000 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 22.8
15% 21.2 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 30.9
20% 22.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual SATA Hard Drive 86GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,520
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,604
343% 1,532 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 37.2
128% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 144
109% 146 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 3x16GB
3 of 128 slots used
48GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback