Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 47.1 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 31.4 23% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 31.4 8-Core 31.6 4% 31.5 Pts	64-Core 31.8 2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0520) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.18 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 117 168 187 190 200 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.2% Below average	Read 227 Write 175 Mixed 144 SusWrite 170 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 9.9 39% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 66.6 DQ Write 59.9 DQ Mixed 59.7 46% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU5-GNL-F 2x4GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 5.2 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16