Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-M52L-S3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M52L-S3P  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091111
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 08:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 81.6
46% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 81.3
11% 81.6 Pts
64-Core 81.7
5% 81.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Asus(1043 82F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 45 46 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 40.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 45.7
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
726GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 112 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 21.5
Write 87
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 111
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M52L-S3P Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M52L-S3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback