Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200415
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '20 at 06:18
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 159 2-Core 319 103% 190 Pts	4-Core 621 8-Core 1,172 107% 896 Pts	64-Core 1,228 76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 108 Parallax 96.3 85% 103 fps	MRender 93.4 Gravity 95.4 Splatting 96 78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 3 2% 3.32 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 0.04 2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB 15,205 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 163 251 274 265 229 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 968 Write 439 Mixed 434 SusWrite 241 115% 520 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 74 4K Mixed 57.7 167% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 707 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 280 267% 431 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 230%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 187GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 283 202 285 278 286 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 490 Mixed 400 SusWrite 291 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 39.8 152% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 194 184% 286 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 99%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 329GB free Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1534 475 451 473 490 485 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,242 Write 2280 Mixed 1,493 SusWrite 651 321% 1,417 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 74.6 252% 95.8 MB/s	DQ Read 762 DQ Write 1,507 DQ Mixed 1,018 807% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 291%
Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 950GB free Firmware: 0001OOS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 149 154 152 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 90.6 Write 130 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 150 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 226% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 110%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 280GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 110 112 115 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 98 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 112 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 106%
Initio HM160HC 160GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 45GB free, PID 1040 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 39 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 38.8 50% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3733 C17 Series 3000 C16 Series 3733 C17 Series 3000 C16 Series 24GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 3500, 3500, 3500, 3500 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 28 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 26 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	892x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	551x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	476x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	288x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	245x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	206x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $545

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16