Today's hottest deals

HP COMPAQ PRESARIO CQ43-215BR NBPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP COMPAQ PRESARIO CQ43-215BR NBPC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3672
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 16:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 120
56% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 177
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 3672) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.22
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2211 240GB-$90
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS221016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 281 290 289 289 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 217
Write 360
Mixed 306
SusWrite 281
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 20.6
70% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 178
174% 276 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 108%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.4 8.4 7.9 8.4 8.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 8.2
10% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 SH564568FH8NZPHSCG 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 1
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback