Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 698
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 108
Parallax 91.7
85% 101 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 99.9
80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 609 617 616 614 597 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,764
Write 1,581
Mixed 1,163
SusWrite 650
288% 1,289 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 75.1
248% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,163
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,056
803% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 236%
Great: 340%
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB-$72
73GB free
Firmware: X231306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 293 289 297 294 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 431
Write 280
Mixed 199
SusWrite 287
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 29.9
125% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 122
126% 209 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
328GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 101 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 102
Mixed 68
SusWrite 101
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
707GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 106 100 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 99
Write 83
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 106
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 22
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $776
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback