Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 165 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 254 37% 270 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L3 SSD 120GB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 29 57 34 43 44 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.8% Poor	Read 201 Write 54.5 Mixed 130 SusWrite 44.2 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 9.4 45% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 9.4 26% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 74GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 134 132 135 136 136 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 124 Write 135 Mixed 26 SusWrite 133 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 0423 Team-Elite-1600 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.8% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 8.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	203x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	64x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	53x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	35x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	25x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $389