Lenovo 81D1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81D1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180716
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 08:14
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Memory 14
1-Core 9.3
2-Core 28.9
10% 17.4 Pts
4-Core 52.1
8-Core 45.4
7% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 9.3
1% 9.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend(17AA 398A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.76 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.17
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 17 17 17 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 11.6
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 17.3
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 79%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID d31a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.7 8.4 7.9 7.9 8.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Read 8
Write 3.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 8.3
10% 7.25 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270NA86H9F-2400 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.08% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 0.9
MC Mixed 1.5
3% 0.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.5 GB/s
Latency 368
11% 368 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81D1 Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback