Today's hottest deals

Seneca PRO423248

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSeneca PRO423248  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-A
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 12:42
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$115
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 118
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 485
38% 336 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 97.5
79% 101 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 94
Splatting 85.5
75% 92.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 81 60 78 102 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 179
Write 195
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 77.8
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 19.1
42% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 41.6
58% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
822GB free
Firmware: A28A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 95 101 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 49.6
Write 101
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 95.3
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 70%
MB3000GCWDB 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 38 39 37 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 157
Write 42.5
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 38.7
50% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback