Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 136
56% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 423
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
PwrHis(1787 2343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 87.5
56% 72.8 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 77.2
54% 64.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-G512M6e 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 502 529 556 565 519 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
466GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 424 399 420 425 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 224
Mixed 270
SusWrite 410
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 41.3
141% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 186
146% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
410GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 435 409 427 429 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 420
Mixed 357
SusWrite 418
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 47.7
154% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 210
159% 214 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
5GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 8.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 11.2
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 8%
eUSB Compact Flash 1GB
0GB free, PID 0311
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.46% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
1GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 10.9
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R938G2401U2S 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $494
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback