Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6400 5,556 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 48.4 32% 45.7 Pts	4-Core 48.2 8-Core 48.4 6% 48.3 Pts	64-Core 49 3% 49 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 83 57 20 57 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.9% Poor	Read 167 Write 142 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 88.6 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 3.8 39% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 92%
ST916082 1A 160GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 88GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 19 21 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 21 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 18.2 26% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 17%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16