Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	22.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '20 at 17:18
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 500 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.53 3% 3.99 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$239 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 147 174 202 179 172 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 207 Write 75.7 Mixed 135 SusWrite 174 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 21.4 88% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 57.1 92% 182 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 85%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 395 392 397 396 398 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 373 Write 236 Mixed 83 SusWrite 395 197% 272 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.8 300% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 221%
SMI USB DISK 16GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.7 7 6.5 6.9 7 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	5.34% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 6.6 10% 9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0N Kingston 9905403-442.A Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A Kingston 9905403-442.A Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 24GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 31.1 92% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $175Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $107	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389