Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 16:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 262
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 695
68% 556 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 3713) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 138
Parallax 117
108% 129 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 153
Splatting 120
107% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 236
Write 120
Mixed 97.5
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 25.6
115% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 73.4
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 100
74% 97 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
389GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 136 136 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 154
Mixed 102
SusWrite 134
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C18D4/8G KHX3200C18D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback