HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 13:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 493
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1790) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 6
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.61 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.78
5% 5.99 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 245 244 243 244 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.9% Good
Read 254
Write 243
Mixed 238
SusWrite 243
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 31
104% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback