Acer Aspire XC-602

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-602  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-602
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 05:32
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 76.1
40% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 74
10% 72.4 Pts
64-Core 82
5% 82 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0803) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 141 213 244 217 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 132
Write 96.5
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 210
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 10
39% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 12.6
10% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 102%
Kingston DTVaultPrivacy30 16GB
14GB free, PID 1505
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 16 21 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 20
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 20.3
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.7
178% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback