Toshiba *

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba *  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PGRAA
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121030
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 115
52% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 99
13% 99 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FC01) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 228 226 225 224 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 444
Write 417
Mixed 365
SusWrite 248
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 31.4
98% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 164
124% 170 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MK1655GSX 160GB-$40
86GB free
Firmware: FG011J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 58.4
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 35.6
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 34%
SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series 128GB
40GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
Read 30
Write 22.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 25.8
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6
434% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical * Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba *

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback