PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-X (all builds) |
Memory | 26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131106 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 08 '20 at 03:02 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.3%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 289 289 289 290 287 MB/s
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 205 220 228 234 232 MB/s
|
61%
Good
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
162GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 89 91 85 88 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 154 155 151 153 151 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel1stBench 67%, 35 samples | 6x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 3x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 01stBench 60%, 1,235 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 8x |
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples | 4x |
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 2x |
SSD | |
---|---|
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $180Bench 113%, 31,076 samples | 4x |
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples | 3x |
CT2000P3SSD8 2TBBench 287%, 10,674 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $425 |