| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 07 '20 at 10:25 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.9%
Good
|
73% 132 Pts
|
50% 385 Pts
|
26% 427 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.1
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
12% 15.1 fps
|
12% 13.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aitc ST100 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2006XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 85 39 46 58 39 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
72% 324 MB/s
|
113% 41.5 MB/s
|
71% 153 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
235GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 121 121 121 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
79% 107 MB/s
|
133% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
iXpand Flash Drive 16GB
3GB free, PID cffb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
40% 37.7 MB/s
|
180% 3.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
42.9%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
43% 93.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 315 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 44x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 39x |
| Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $99Bench 68%, 93,718 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $159 |