Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 56.9 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 179 59% 108 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 619 59% 485 Pts	64-Core 911 56% 911 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 93.5 Parallax 85.1 70% 87.9 fps	MRender 90.9 Gravity 90 Splatting 93.2 75% 91.4 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 959GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 459 449 449 449 449 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 79% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 8x16GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 32.6 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 7 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	89x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	147x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	20x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	19x