ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	ACRSYS ACRPRDCT
Motherboard	AMD Bali
Memory	3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '17 at 17:44
Run Duration	5077 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II M300 1,238 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 60.4 34% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 59.6 8-Core 60.9 8% 60.2 Pts	64-Core 59.6 4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 027E) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 186 1675 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4310 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3027 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3333 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 58643 (C2) HDA temperature 118 91 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	25.9% Poor	Read 50.8 Write 39.4 Mixed 37.3 32% 42.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.66 4K Mixed 0.11 29% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 41%
GENERIC USB DISK DEVICE 0GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Read 0.82 Write 0.54 Mixed 0.63 1% 0.66 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.09 9% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%
LG USB DRIVE 0GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 2168 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 6.57 Mixed 7.96 10% 8.24 MB/s	4K Read 3.85 4K Write 0.18 4K Mixed 0.17 26% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 5%
Samsung Yepp YP-T5 1GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 501b Operating at USB 1.1 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Read 0.88 Write 0.54 Mixed 0.68 1% 0.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.08 4K Mixed 0.06 7% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%
USB2.0 (FS) FLASH DISK 0GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Read 0.82 Write 0.54 Mixed 0.65 1% 0.67 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.09 9% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 1%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 2x2GB 477 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback