Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B61
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171220
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '20 at 14:21
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$186 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 239 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 771 77% 625 Pts	64-Core 1,053 65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.3% Average	Lighting 68.6 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 62.3 56% 64.8 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 63.9 Splatting 0.04 30% 42.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$62 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 54 1.5 29 2.8 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 360 Write 146 Mixed 210 SusWrite 26.8 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 11.8 59% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 52 DQ Mixed 37.5 40% 67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 231GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 125 127 128 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 123 Write 136 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 126 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 967GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 62 60 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 73.6 Write 121 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 61.1 63% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.7 199% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 1x16GB 1,722 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	345x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	251x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	193x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	384x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	180x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	166x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $636