Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C9
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 13:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 276
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 6.72
6% 6.86 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 0.09
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 935 808 555 563 565 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 825
Write 914
Mixed 849
SusWrite 717
186% 826 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 71.2
246% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 672
527% 726 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 186%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310NA86H9F-2666 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 19.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 1,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback