Apple iMac13,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple iMac13,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-00BE6ED71E35EB86
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 12:46
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330S
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 155
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 304
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Apple(106B 0109) 512MB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 382.05
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 8.34
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 8.57
Splatting 6.22
6% 7.96 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FUJITSU MHU2100AT 100GB
77GB free (System drive), PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 5.9 8.2 9.3 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 12
Write 9
Mixed 11
SusWrite 9.1
14% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac13,1 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac13,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback