Today's hottest deals

HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 22:22
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 39.3
1-Core 27
2-Core 39.1
24% 35.1 Pts
4-Core 60.5
8-Core 78
9% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 59.9
4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics
HP(103C 8158) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.53
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LJT-128L6G-11 M.2 2260 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DJ7110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 208 222 217 230 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 341
Write 270
Mixed 229
SusWrite 214
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 14.9
54% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 117
91% 125 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 93%
PSSBN008GA27MC0 8GB
3GB free
Firmware: SBFH01A0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 249
Write 94.8
Mixed 122
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 12.1
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 61.4
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 77.5
59% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 206
20% 206 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback