| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus STRIKER II EXTREME (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100128 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 05 '20 at 20:40 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
|
61.1%
Good
|
56% 90.8 Pts
|
33% 251 Pts
|
16% 250 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.6%
Above average
|
56% 71.4 fps
|
53% 66.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 166 198 202 203 203 MB/s
|
61%
Good
|
46% 205 MB/s
|
119% 41.8 MB/s
|
40% 59.6 MB/s
|
|
Intenso Basic Line 8GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7 7.8 7.3 7.8 6.3 MB/s
|
2.12%
Terrible
|
6% 4.53 MB/s
|
1% 0.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.9%
Poor
|
17% 6.1 GB/s
|
21% 7.2 GB/s
|
49% 81.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical STRIKER II EXTREME Builds (Compare 31 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus STRIKER II EXTREME
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $687 |