Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 12:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6146
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 232
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 464
64% 472 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 1326) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.06
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 131%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 80.7
Mixed 199
51% 236 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 16.3
50% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 198
165% 244 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback