Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 05:15
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 393
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
MSI(1462 2808) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 23.1
14% 18.8 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 15.3
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X230600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 264 272 290 259 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 451
Write 287
Mixed 220
SusWrite 274
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 27.6
102% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 124
129% 214 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 293
Write 33.1
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 33.7
99% 105 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 4.7
823% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 5.4
956% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Memorex Travel Drive 4GB
0GB free, PID 0688
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.1 3.6 3.9 3.8 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 3.6
9% 8.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8502 PSD34G160081 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8502 PSD34G160081 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback